<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="nb">
	<id>https://matematikk.net/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jarle</id>
	<title>Matematikk.net - Brukerbidrag [nb]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://matematikk.net/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jarle"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/side/Spesial:Bidrag/Jarle"/>
	<updated>2026-04-08T23:01:46Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Brukerbidrag</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3653</id>
		<title>Bruker:Karl Erik/Problem5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3653"/>
		<updated>2011-02-04T20:32:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jarle: Tømmer siden&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jarle</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem10&amp;diff=3649</id>
		<title>Bruker:Karl Erik/Problem10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem10&amp;diff=3649"/>
		<updated>2011-02-04T18:48:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jarle: Tømmer siden&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jarle</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3627</id>
		<title>Bruker:Karl Erik/Problem5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3627"/>
		<updated>2011-02-04T03:27:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jarle: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Problem5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Define &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for natural &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as the determinant &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We have that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_{n+2} = \begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix} = a \underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-1}}}-b\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}c&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n-1}} = ad_{n-1} -bc\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-2}}} +b^2\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}0&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=0}} =ad_{n-1}-bcd_{n-2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristic polynomial for this difference equation is &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r^2-ar+bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and solving it for zero yields &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{a+\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{a-\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hereby assuming &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (so that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 \not = r_2&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, neither are 0), we have &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_1 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_2 = a^2-bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so we can extend the definition of the &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&#039;s by setting &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Now, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =Ar_1^n+Br_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for constants &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. But &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A+B = d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;Ar_1+Br_2 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A(r_1-r_2)+r_2=a \Rightarrow A = \frac{a-r_2}{r_1-r_2}=\frac{r_1}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B = \frac{r_1-r_2-r_1}{r_1-r_2}= -\frac{r_2}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hence &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n = \frac{r_1^{n+1}-r_2^{n+1}}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, which for &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; can be factorized to &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\frac{(r_1-r_2)(r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n)}{\sqrt{a^2-4bc}} = r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assumed in our calculations that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, but considering the fact that the determinant is continuous as a function in the variable &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (choosing any &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and keeping them constant) over (for simplicity) the complex numbers, and that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (considered a function in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; on the set of complex points such that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; which consists of all but maximally two points) in its last stated form (which is continuous) have a unique continuous extension (the limits of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a \to \pm 2 \sqrt{bc}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; both trivially exists), we know that this extension must coincide with the determinant for every complex point &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Thus we consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; extended, and therefore equal to the determinant for all complex numbers &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n) = \prod^n_{k=1}(a-2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Choose any points &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; has degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (being the determinant) is a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (with the same choice of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;), and is also of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. If we can show that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; share the same set of non-equal zeros, they must be equal up to a constant. This constant must in that case be 1, since &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(1)=a=d_1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To show this, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a = 2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for any integer &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; between &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Then &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{i\frac{n\pi k}{n+1}}+\sqrt{bc}^{n-1}e^{i\frac{(n-1)\pi k}{n+1}}\sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} + ... +\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} \\ = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}(e^{i\frac{n 2\pi k}{n+1}}+e^{i\frac{(n-1)2\pi k}{n+1}}+...+1) =\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}\frac{e^{i\frac{(n+1) 2\pi k}{n+1}} \ -1}{e^{i\frac{2\pi k}{n+1}}-1}=0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and we are done.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jarle</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3626</id>
		<title>Bruker:Karl Erik/Problem5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3626"/>
		<updated>2011-02-04T03:25:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jarle: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Problem5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Define &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for natural &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as the determinant &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We have that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_{n+2} = \begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix} = a \underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-1}}}-b\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}c&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n-1}} = ad_{n-1} -bc\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-2}}} +b^2\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}0&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=0}} =ad_{n-1}-bcd_{n-2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristic polynomial for this difference equation is &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r^2-ar+bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and solving it for zero yields &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{a+\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{a-\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hereby assuming &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (so that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 \not = r_2&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, neither are 0), we have &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_1 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_2 = a^2-bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so we can extend the definition of the &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&#039;s by setting &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Now, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =Ar_1^n+Br_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for constants &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. But &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A+B = d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;Ar_1+Br_2 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A(r_1-r_2)+r_2=a \Rightarrow A = \frac{a-r_2}{r_1-r_2}=\frac{r_1}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B = \frac{r_1-r_2-r_1}{r_1-r_2}= -\frac{r_2}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hence &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n = \frac{r_1^{n+1}-r_2^{n+1}}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, which for &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; can be factorized to &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\frac{(r_1-r_2)(r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n)}{\sqrt{a^2-4bc}} = r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assumed in our calculations that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, but considering the fact that the determinant is continuous as a function in the variable &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (choosing any &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and keeping them constant) over (for simplicity) the complex numbers, and that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (considered a function in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; on the set of complex points such that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; which consists of all but maximally two points) in its last stated form (which is continuous) have a unique continuous extension (the limits of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a \to \pm 2 \sqrt{bc}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; both trivially exists), we know that this extension must coincide with the determinant for every complex point &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Thus we consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; extended, and therefore equal to the determinant for all complex numbers &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n) = \prod^n_{k=1}(a-2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Choose any points &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; has degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (being the determinant) is a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (with the same choice of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;), and is also of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. If we can show that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; share the same set of non-equal zeros, they must be equal up to a constant. This constant must in that case be 1, since &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(1)=a=d_1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To show this, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a = 2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for any integer &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; between &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Then &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{i\frac{n\pi k}{n+1}}+\sqrt{bc}^{n-1}e^{i\frac{(n-1)\pi k}{n+1}}\sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} + ... +\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} \\ = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}(e^{i\frac{n 2\pi k}{n+1}}+e^{i\frac{(n-1)2\pi k}{n+1}}+...+1) =\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}\frac{e^{i\frac{(n+1) 2\pi k}{n+1}} \ -1}{e^{i\frac{2\pi k}{n+1}}-1}=0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and we are done.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jarle</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3625</id>
		<title>Bruker:Karl Erik/Problem5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3625"/>
		<updated>2011-02-04T03:24:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jarle: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Problem5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Define &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for natural &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as the determinant &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We have that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_{n+2} = \begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix} = a \underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-1}}}-b\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}c&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n-1}} = ad_{n-1} -bc\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-2}}} +b^2\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}0&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=0}} =ad_{n-1}-bcd_{n-2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristic polynomial for this difference equation is &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r^2-ar+bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and solving it for zero yields &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{a+\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{a-\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hereby assuming &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (so that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 \not = r_2&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, neither are 0), we have &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_1 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_2 = a^2-bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so we can extend the definition of the &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&#039;s by setting &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Now, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =Ar_1^n+Br_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for constants &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. But &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A+B = d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;Ar_1+Br_2 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A(r_1-r_2)+r_2=a \Rightarrow A = \frac{a-r_2}{r_1-r_2}=\frac{r_1}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B = \frac{r_1-r_2-r_1}{r_1-r_2}= -\frac{r_2}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hence &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n = \frac{r_1^{n+1}-r_2^{n+1}}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, which for &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; can be factorized to &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\frac{(r_1-r_2)(r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n)}{\sqrt{a^2-4bc}} = r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assumed in our calculations that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, but considering the fact that the determinant is continuous as a function in the variable &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (choosing any &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and keeping them constant) over (for simplicity) the complex numbers, and that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (considered a function in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; on the set of complex points such that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; which consists of all but maximally two points) in its last stated form (which is continuous) have a unique continuous extension (the limits of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a \to \pm 2 \sqrt{bc}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; both trivially exists), we know that this extension must coincide with the determinant for every complex point &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Thus we consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; extended, and therefore equal to the determinant for all complex numbers &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n) = \prod^n_{k=1}(a-2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Choose any points &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; is the of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (being the determinant) is a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (with the same choice of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;), and is also of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. If we can show that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; share the same set of non-equal zeros, they must be equal up to a constant. This constant must in that case be 1, since &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(1)=a=d_1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To show this, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a = 2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for any integer &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; between &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Then &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{i\frac{n\pi k}{n+1}}+\sqrt{bc}^{n-1}e^{i\frac{(n-1)\pi k}{n+1}}\sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} + ... +\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} \\ = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}(e^{i\frac{n 2\pi k}{n+1}}+e^{i\frac{(n-1)2\pi k}{n+1}}+...+1) =\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}\frac{e^{i\frac{(n+1) 2\pi k}{n+1}} \ -1}{e^{i\frac{2\pi k}{n+1}}-1}=0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and we are done.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jarle</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3624</id>
		<title>Bruker:Karl Erik/Problem5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3624"/>
		<updated>2011-02-04T03:22:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jarle: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Problem5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Define &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for natural &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as the determinant &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We have that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_{n+2} = \begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix} = a \underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-1}}}-b\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}c&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n-1}} = ad_{n-1} -bc\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-2}}} +b^2\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}0&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=0}} =ad_{n-1}-bcd_{n-2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristic polynomial for this difference equation is &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r^2-ar+bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and solving it for zero yields &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{a+\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{a-\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hereby assuming &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (so that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 \not = r_2&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, neither are 0), we have &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_1 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_2 = a^2-bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so we can extend the definition of the &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&#039;s by setting &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Now, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =Ar_1^n+Br_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for constants &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. But &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A+B = d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;Ar_1+Br_2 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A(r_1-r_2)+r_2=a \Rightarrow A = \frac{a-r_2}{r_1-r_2}=\frac{r_1}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B = \frac{r_1-r_2-r_1}{r_1-r_2}= -\frac{r_2}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hence &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n = \frac{r_1^{n+1}-r_2^{n+1}}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, which for &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; can be factorized to &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\frac{(r_1-r_2)(r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n)}{\sqrt{a^2-4bc}} = r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assumed in our calculations that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, but considering the fact that the determinant is continuous as a function in the variable &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (keeping b and c constant) over (for simplicity) the complex numbers, and that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (considered a function in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; on the set of complex points such that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; which consists of all but maximally two points) in its last stated form (which is continuous) have a unique continuous extension (the limits of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a \to \pm 2 \sqrt{bc}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; both trivially exists), we know that this extension must coincide with the determinant for every complex point &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Thus we consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; extended, and therefore equal to the determinant for all complex numbers &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n) = \prod^n_{k=1}(a-2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Choose any points &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; is the of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (being the determinant) is a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (with the same choice of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;), and is also of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. If we can show that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; share the same set of non-equal zeros, they must be equal up to a constant. This constant must in that case be 1, since &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(1)=a=d_1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To show this, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a = 2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for any integer &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; between &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Then &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{i\frac{n\pi k}{n+1}}+\sqrt{bc}^{n-1}e^{i\frac{(n-1)\pi k}{n+1}}\sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} + ... +\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} \\ = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}(e^{i\frac{n 2\pi k}{n+1}}+e^{i\frac{(n-1)2\pi k}{n+1}}+...+1) =\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}\frac{e^{i\frac{(n+1) 2\pi k}{n+1}} \ -1}{e^{i\frac{2\pi k}{n+1}}-1}=0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and we are done.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jarle</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3623</id>
		<title>Bruker:Karl Erik/Problem5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3623"/>
		<updated>2011-02-04T03:20:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jarle: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Problem5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Define &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for natural &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as the determinant &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We have that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_{n+2} = \begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix} = a \underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-1}}}-b\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}c&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n-1}} = ad_{n-1} -bc\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-2}}} +b^2\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}0&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=0}} =ad_{n-1}-bcd_{n-2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristic polynomial for this difference equation is &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r^2-ar+bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and solving it for zero yields &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{a+\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{a-\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hereby assuming &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (so that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 \not = r_2&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, neither are 0), we have &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_1 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_2 = a^2-bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so we can extend the definition of the &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&#039;s by setting &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Now, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =Ar_1^n+Br_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for constants &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. But &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A+B = d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;Ar_1+Br_2 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A(r_1-r_2)+r_2=a \Rightarrow A = \frac{a-r_2}{r_1-r_2}=\frac{r_1}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B = \frac{r_1-r_2-r_1}{r_1-r_2}= -\frac{r_2}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hence &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n = \frac{r_1^{n+1}-r_2^{n+1}}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, which for &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; can be factorized to &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\frac{(r_1-r_2)(r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n)}{\sqrt{a^2-4bc}} = r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assumed in our calculations that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, but considering the fact that the determinant is continuous as a function in the variable &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (keeping b and c constant) over (for simplicity) the complex numbers, and that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (considered a function in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; on the set of complex points such that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; which consists of all but maximally two points) in its last stated form have a unique continuous extension (the limits of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a \to \pm 2 \sqrt{bc}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; both trivially exists), we know that this extension must coincide with the determinant for every complex point &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Thus we consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; extended, and therefore equal to the determinant for all complex numbers &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n) = \prod^n_{k=1}(a-2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Choose any points &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; is the of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (being the determinant) is a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (with the same choice of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;), and is also of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. If we can show that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; share the same set of non-equal zeros, they must be equal up to a constant. This constant must in that case be 1, since &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(1)=a=d_1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To show this, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a = 2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for any integer &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; between &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Then &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{i\frac{n\pi k}{n+1}}+\sqrt{bc}^{n-1}e^{i\frac{(n-1)\pi k}{n+1}}\sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} + ... +\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} \\ = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}(e^{i\frac{n 2\pi k}{n+1}}+e^{i\frac{(n-1)2\pi k}{n+1}}+...+1) =\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}\frac{e^{i\frac{(n+1) 2\pi k}{n+1}} \ -1}{e^{i\frac{2\pi k}{n+1}}-1}=0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and we are done.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jarle</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3622</id>
		<title>Bruker:Karl Erik/Problem5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3622"/>
		<updated>2011-02-04T03:19:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jarle: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Problem5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Define &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for natural &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as the determinant &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We have that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_{n+2} = \begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix} = a \underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-1}}}-b\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}c&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n-1}} = ad_{n-1} -bc\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-2}}} +b^2\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}0&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=0}} =ad_{n-1}-bcd_{n-2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristic polynomial for this difference equation is &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r^2-ar+bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and solving it for zero yields &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{a+\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{a-\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hereby assuming &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (so that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 \not = r_2&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, neither are 0), we have &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_1 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_2 = a^2-bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so we can extend the definition of the &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&#039;s by setting &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Now, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =Ar_1^n+Br_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for constants &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. But &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A+B = d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;Ar_1+Br_2 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A(r_1-r_2)+r_2=a \Rightarrow A = \frac{a-r_2}{r_1-r_2}=\frac{r_1}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B = \frac{r_1-r_2-r_1}{r_1-r_2}= -\frac{r_2}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hence &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n = \frac{r_1^{n+1}-r_2^{n+1}}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, which for &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; can be factorized to &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\frac{(r_1-r_2)(r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n)}{\sqrt{a^2-4bc}} = r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assumed in our calculations that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, but considering the fact that the determinant is continuous as a function in the variable &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (keeping b and c constant) over (for simplicity) the complex numbers, and that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (considered a function in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; on the set of complex points such that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; which consists of all but maximally two points) in its last stated form have a unique continuous extension (the limits of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a \to \pm 2 \sqrt{bc}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; both trivially exists), we know that this extension must coincide with the determinant for every complex point &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Thus we consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; extended, and equal to the determinant for all complex numbers &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n) = \prod^n_{k=1}(a-2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Choose any points &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; is the of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (being the determinant) is a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (with the same choice of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;), and is also of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. If we can show that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; share the same set of non-equal zeros, they must be equal up to a constant. This constant must in that case be 1, since &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(1)=a=d_1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To show this, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a = 2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for any integer &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; between &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Then &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{i\frac{n\pi k}{n+1}}+\sqrt{bc}^{n-1}e^{i\frac{(n-1)\pi k}{n+1}}\sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} + ... +\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} \\ = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}(e^{i\frac{n 2\pi k}{n+1}}+e^{i\frac{(n-1)2\pi k}{n+1}}+...+1) =\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}\frac{e^{i\frac{(n+1) 2\pi k}{n+1}} \ -1}{e^{i\frac{2\pi k}{n+1}}-1}=0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and we are done.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jarle</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3621</id>
		<title>Bruker:Karl Erik/Problem5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3621"/>
		<updated>2011-02-04T03:16:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jarle: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Problem5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Define &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for natural &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as the determinant &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We have that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_{n+2} = \begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix} = a \underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-1}}}-b\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}c&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n-1}} = ad_{n-1} -bc\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-2}}} +b^2\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}0&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=0}} =ad_{n-1}-bcd_{n-2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristic polynomial for this difference equation is &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r^2-ar+bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and solving it for zero yields &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{a+\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{a-\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hereby assuming &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 \not = r_2&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and they are neither 0), we have &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_1 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_2 = a^2-bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so we can extend the definition of the &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&#039;s by setting &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Now, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =Ar_1^n+Br_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for constants &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. But &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A+B = d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;Ar_1+Br_2 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A(r_1-r_2)+r_2=a \Rightarrow A = \frac{a-r_2}{r_1-r_2}=\frac{r_1}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B = \frac{r_1-r_2-r_1}{r_1-r_2}= -\frac{r_2}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hence &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n = \frac{r_1^{n+1}-r_2^{n+1}}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, which for &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; can be factorized to &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\frac{(r_1-r_2)(r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n)}{\sqrt{a^2-4bc}} = r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assumed in our calculations that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, but considering the fact that the determinant is continuous as a function in the variable &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (keeping b and c constant) over (for simplicity) the complex numbers, and that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (considered a function in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; on the set of complex points such that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; which consists of all but maximally two points) in its last stated form have a unique continuous extension (the limits of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a \to \pm 2 \sqrt{bc}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; both trivially exists), we know that this extension must coincide with the determinant for every complex point &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Thus we consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; extended, and equal to the determinant for all complex numbers &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n) = \prod^n_{k=1}(a-2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Choose any points &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; is the of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (being the determinant) is a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (with the same choice of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;), and is also of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. If we can show that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; share the same set of non-equal zeros, they must be equal up to a constant. This constant must in that case be 1, since &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(1)=a=d_1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To show this, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a = 2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for any integer &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; between &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Then &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{i\frac{n\pi k}{n+1}}+\sqrt{bc}^{n-1}e^{i\frac{(n-1)\pi k}{n+1}}\sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} + ... +\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} \\ = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}(e^{i\frac{n 2\pi k}{n+1}}+e^{i\frac{(n-1)2\pi k}{n+1}}+...+1) =\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}\frac{e^{i\frac{(n+1) 2\pi k}{n+1}} \ -1}{e^{i\frac{2\pi k}{n+1}}-1}=0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and we are done.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jarle</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3620</id>
		<title>Bruker:Karl Erik/Problem5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3620"/>
		<updated>2011-02-04T03:14:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jarle: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Problem5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Define &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for natural &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as the determinant &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We have that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_{n+2} = \begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix} = a \underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-1}}}-b\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}c&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n-1}} = ad_{n-1} -bc\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-2}}} +b^2\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}0&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=0}} =ad_{n-1}-bcd_{n-2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristic polynomial for this difference equation is &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r^2-ar+bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and solving it for zero yields &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{a+\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{a-\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hereby assuming &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 \not = r_2&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and they are neither 0), we have &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_1 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_2 = a^2-bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so we can extend the definition of the &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&#039;s by setting &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Now, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =Ar_1^n+Br_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for constants &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. But &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A+B = d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;Ar_1+Br_2 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A(r_1-r_2)+r_2=a \Rightarrow A = \frac{a-r_2}{r_1-r_2}=\frac{r_1}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B = \frac{r_1-r_2-r_1}{r_1-r_2}= -\frac{r_2}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hence &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n = \frac{r_1^{n+1}-r_2^{n+1}}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, which for &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; can be factorized to &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\frac{(r_1-r_2)(r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n)}{\sqrt{a^2-4bc}} = r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assumed in our calculations that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, but considering the fact that the determinant is continuous as a function in the variable &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (keeping b and c constant) over (for simplicity) the complex numbers, and that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (considered a function in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; on the set of complex points such that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; which consists of all but maximally two points) in its last stated form have a unique continuous extension (the limits of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a \to \pm 2 \sqrt{bc}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; both trivially exists), we know that this extension must coincide with the determinant for every complex point &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n) = \prod^n_{k=1}(a-2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Choose any points &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; is the of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (being the determinant) is a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (with the same choice of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;), and is also of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. If we can show that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; share the same set of non-equal zeros, they must be equal up to a constant. This constant must in that case be 1, since &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(1)=a=d_1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To show this, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a = 2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for any integer &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; between &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Then &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{i\frac{n\pi k}{n+1}}+\sqrt{bc}^{n-1}e^{i\frac{(n-1)\pi k}{n+1}}\sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} + ... +\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} \\ = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}(e^{i\frac{n 2\pi k}{n+1}}+e^{i\frac{(n-1)2\pi k}{n+1}}+...+1) =\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}\frac{e^{i\frac{(n+1) 2\pi k}{n+1}} \ -1}{e^{i\frac{2\pi k}{n+1}}-1}=0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and we are done.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jarle</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3619</id>
		<title>Bruker:Karl Erik/Problem5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3619"/>
		<updated>2011-02-04T03:13:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jarle: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Problem5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Define &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for natural &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as the determinant &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We have that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_{n+2} = \begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix} = a \underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-1}}}-b\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}c&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n-1}} = ad_{n-1} -bc\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-2}}} +b^2\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}0&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=0}} =ad_{n-1}-bcd_{n-2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristic polynomial for this difference equation is &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r^2-ar+bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and solving it for zero yields &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{a+\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{a-\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hereby assuming &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 \not = r_2&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and they are neither 0), we have &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_1 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_2 = a^2-bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so we can extend the definition of the &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&#039;s by setting &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Now, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =Ar_1^n+Br_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for constants &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. But &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A+B = d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;Ar_1+Br_2 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A(r_1-r_2)+r_2=a \Rightarrow A = \frac{a-r_2}{r_1-r_2}=\frac{r_1}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B = \frac{r_1-r_2-r_1}{r_1-r_2}= -\frac{r_2}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hence &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n = \frac{r_1^{n+1}-r_2^{n+1}}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, which for &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; can be factorized to &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\frac{(r_1-r_2)(r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n)}{\sqrt{a^2-4bc}} = r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assumed in our calculations that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, but considering the fact that the determinant is continuous as a function in the variable &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (keeping b and c constant) over (for simplicity) the complex numbers, and that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (considered a function in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; on the set of complex points such that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; which consists of all but two points) in its last stated form have a unique continuous extension (the limits of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a \to \pm 2 \sqrt{bc}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; both trivially exists), we know that this extension must coincide with the determinant for every complex point &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n) = \prod^n_{k=1}(a-2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Choose any points &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; is the of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (being the determinant) is a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (with the same choice of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;), and is also of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. If we can show that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; share the same set of non-equal zeros, they must be equal up to a constant. This constant must in that case be 1, since &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(1)=a=d_1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To show this, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a = 2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for any integer &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; between &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Then &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{i\frac{n\pi k}{n+1}}+\sqrt{bc}^{n-1}e^{i\frac{(n-1)\pi k}{n+1}}\sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} + ... +\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} \\ = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}(e^{i\frac{n 2\pi k}{n+1}}+e^{i\frac{(n-1)2\pi k}{n+1}}+...+1) =\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}\frac{e^{i\frac{(n+1) 2\pi k}{n+1}} \ -1}{e^{i\frac{2\pi k}{n+1}}-1}=0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and we are done.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jarle</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem10&amp;diff=3618</id>
		<title>Bruker:Karl Erik/Problem10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem10&amp;diff=3618"/>
		<updated>2011-02-04T02:29:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jarle: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Problem10&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Define &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n) = \sum^n_{k=1} \gcd(k,n)\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{n}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We will be using that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\sum^m_{k=1}\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{m} = \Re(\sum^m_{k=1}e^{i\frac{2 \pi k}{m}}) = \Re(e^{i\frac{2 \pi}{m}}\frac{e^{mi\frac{2 \pi}{m}}-1}{e^{i\frac{2 \pi}{m}-1}}) = 0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consider a prime p. Then &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(p) = \sum^p_{k=1} \gcd(k,p)\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{p} = \sum^p_{k=1} \cos \frac{2 \pi k}{p} +(p-1)\cos \frac{2 \pi p}{p} = p-1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We will show that if &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a_1,a_2,...,a_r&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; are distinct prime factors, then &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(a_1...a_r) = (a_1-1)...(a_r-1)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; by induction on &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We have already shown this for &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so suppose it is true for &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;s \leq r&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n = a_1...a_s&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a_{s+1}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; be a prime not among the prime factors of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(na_{s+1}) = \sum^{na_{s+1}}_{k=1} \gcd(k,na_{s+1})\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{na_{s+1}} = \sum^{na_{s+1}}_{k=1} \gcd(k,n)\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{na_{s+1}} + (a_{s+1}-1)\sum^{n}_{k=1} \gcd(k,n)\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{n} \\ =\sum^{na_{s+1}}_{k=1} \gcd(k,n)\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{na_{s+1}} +(a_{s+1}-1)f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it remains to show that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\sum^{np}_{k=1} \gcd(k,n)\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{np} = 0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; whenever &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; is a prime not among the distinct prime factors of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Now, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\sum^{np}_{k=1} \gcd(k,n)\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{np} = &lt;br /&gt;
\sum^{n}_{k=1} \gcd(k,n)\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{np} + \sum^{2n}_{k=n+1} \gcd(k,n)\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{np} + ... + \sum^{np}_{k=n(p-1)+1} \gcd(k,n)\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{np} \\ = \sum^{n}_{k=1} \gcd(k,n)\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{np} + \sum^{n}_{k=1} \gcd(k+n,n)\cos \frac{2 \pi (k+n)}{np} + ... + \sum^{n}_{k=1} \gcd(k+(p-1)n,n)\cos \frac{2 \pi (k+(p-1)n)}{np} \\ = \sum^{n}_{k=1} \gcd(k,n)\left(\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{np} +\cos (\frac{2 \pi k}{np}+\frac{2\pi}{p}) + \cos (\frac{2 \pi k}{np}+\frac{2\pi2}{p}) + ... + \cos (\frac{2 \pi k}{np}+\frac{2\pi(p-1)}{p}) \right)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But for each &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; between &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, we have &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{np} +\cos (\frac{2 \pi k}{np}+\frac{2\pi}{p}) + \cos (\frac{2 \pi k}{np}+\frac{2\pi2}{p}) + ... + \cos (\frac{2 \pi k}{np}+\frac{2\pi(p-1)}{p}) = \Re(e^{ i\frac{2 \pi k}{np}} +e^{i (\frac{2 \pi k}{np}+\frac{2\pi}{p})} + e^{i (\frac{2 \pi k}{np}+\frac{2\pi2}{p})} + ... + e^{i(\frac{2 \pi k}{np}+\frac{2\pi(p-1)}{p})}) \\ = \Re(e^{ i\frac{2 \pi k}{np}}(1+e^{i \frac{2\pi}{p}} + e^{i\frac{2\pi2}{p}} + ... + e^{i\frac{2\pi(p-1)}{p})}) = 0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus we conclude that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(na_{s+1})=(a_{s+1}-1)f(n)=(a_1-1)...(a_s-1)(a_{s+1}-1)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and we are done.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;2010 = 2 \times 3 \times 5 \times 67&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; is a product of distinct prime factors, so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\sum^{2010}_{k=1} \gcd(k,2010)\cos \frac{2 \pi k}{2010} = f(2010) = (2-1)(3-1)(5-1)(67-1)=528&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jarle</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3617</id>
		<title>Bruker:Karl Erik/Problem5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem5&amp;diff=3617"/>
		<updated>2011-02-04T01:28:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jarle: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Problem5&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Define &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for natural &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as the determinant &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We have that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_{n+2} = \begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix} = a \underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-1}}}-b\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}c&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{n-1}} = ad_{n-1} -bc\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}a&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ c &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=d_{n-2}}} +b^2\underbrace{\begin{vmatrix}0&amp;amp;b&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;0\\ 0 &amp;amp; a &amp;amp; \ldots &amp;amp; 0\\ \vdots &amp;amp; \vdots &amp;amp; \ddots &amp;amp; \vdots\\ 0 &amp;amp;0&amp;amp;\ldots&amp;amp;a\end{vmatrix}}_{\mbox{=0}} =ad_{n-1}-bcd_{n-2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristic polynomial for this difference equation is &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r^2-ar+bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and solving it for zero yields &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{a+\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{a-\sqrt{a^2-4bc}}{2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hereby assuming &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 \not = r_2&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and they are neither 0), we have &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_1 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_2 = a^2-bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so we can extend the definition of the &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&#039;s by setting &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Now, &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =Ar_1^n+Br_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for constants &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. But &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A+B = d_0 = 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;Ar_1+Br_2 = a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;A(r_1-r_2)+r_2=a \Rightarrow A = \frac{a-r_2}{r_1-r_2}=\frac{r_1}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;B = \frac{r_1-r_2-r_1}{r_1-r_2}= -\frac{r_2}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Hence &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n = \frac{r_1^{n+1}-r_2^{n+1}}{\sqrt{a^2-bc}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, which for &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; can be factorized to &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\frac{(r_1-r_2)(r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n)}{\sqrt{a^2-4bc}} = r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assumed in our calculations that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = 4bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, but considering the fact that the determinant is continuous as a function in the variable &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, (keeping b and c constant), and that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (considered a function in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; on the set of points such that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a^2 \not = bc&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; which consists of all but two points) in its last stated form have a unique continuous extension (the limits of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a \to \pm 2 \sqrt{bc}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; both trivially exists), we know that this extension must coincide with the determinant for every point &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n) = \prod^n_{k=1}(a-2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Choose any points &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and consider &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; as a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; is the of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (being the determinant) is a polynomial in &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; (with the same choice of &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;), and is also of degree &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. If we can show that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(n)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; share the same set of non-equal zeros, they must be equal up to a constant. This constant must in that case be 1, since &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(1)=a=d_1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To show this, let &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a = 2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for any integer &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; between &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. Then &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_1 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})+i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;r_2 = \frac{2\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-\sqrt{4bc\cos^2(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-4bc}}{2}=\sqrt{bc}\cos(\frac{\pi k}{n+1})-i\sqrt{bc}\sin(\frac{\pi k}{n+1}) = \sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;d_n =r_1^n+r_1^{n-1}r_2+...+r_1r_2^{n-1}+r_2^n = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{i\frac{n\pi k}{n+1}}+\sqrt{bc}^{n-1}e^{i\frac{(n-1)\pi k}{n+1}}\sqrt{bc}e^{-i\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} + ... +\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}} \\ = \sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}(e^{i\frac{n 2\pi k}{n+1}}+e^{i\frac{(n-1)2\pi k}{n+1}}+...+1) =\sqrt{bc}^ne^{-in\frac{\pi k}{n+1}}\frac{e^{i\frac{(n+1) 2\pi k}{n+1}} \ -1}{e^{i\frac{2\pi k}{n+1}}-1}=0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and we are done.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jarle</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem7&amp;diff=3616</id>
		<title>Bruker:Karl Erik/Problem7</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://matematikk.net/w/index.php?title=Bruker:Karl_Erik/Problem7&amp;diff=3616"/>
		<updated>2011-02-04T00:06:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jarle: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Problem7&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Consider the function &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f: (0,1] \to \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; defined by &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f(x) = \frac{\tan x}{x}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We will show that it is increasing on its domain. We have &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f^{\prime}(x) = \frac{(\tan^2x+1)x-\tan(x)}{x^2}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and this function is non-negative if we can show that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;(\tan^2x+1)x-\tan(x) \geq 0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for all &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;x \in (0,1)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. To verify this, consider the function &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;g: [0,1) \to \mathbb{R}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; defined by &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;g(x) = (\tan^2(x)+1)x-\tan(x)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;g(0) = 0&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;g^{\prime}(x) = \tan^2(x)+1+x(2\tan(x)(\tan^2(x)+1))-(\tan^2(x)+1) = 2x\tan(x)(\tan^2(x)+1)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; which clearly is non-negative on &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;[0,1)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. By this we conclude that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; is an increasing function. Hence for any &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;x \in (0,1)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; we have &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\frac{\tan(x)}{x} \leq \tan(1)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, or equivalently &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\tan(x) \leq x\tan(1)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Define &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b_n = a_n-n&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; for every &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;n \in \mathbb{N}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. We know that &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;a_n \in (n,n+1)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, so &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b_n \in (0,1)&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. By the preceding paragraph, we have &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\tan(1)(\pi b_n) \geq \tan(\pi b_n)=\tan(\pi (a_n+n)) = \tan(\pi a_n)=\frac{1}{a_n} = \frac{1}{b_n+n} \geq \frac{1}{n+1}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;, hence &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;b_n \geq \frac{1}{(n+1)\tan(1)\pi}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;. It follows that the sum &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;\sum^N_{n=0}a_n-n \geq \frac{1}{\tan(1)\pi} \sum^N_{n=0} \frac{1}{n+1}&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt; and thus diverges as &amp;lt;tex&amp;gt;N \to \infty&amp;lt;/tex&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jarle</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>